The Heart of America

After this unit on affluence and poverty, and especially after the artifact 'Roger and Me', it has become apparent to me just how important cars are to Americans. The unit has almost been about the automobile the same as it has been about privilege and affluence. Few, if any, Americans since the beginning of the 20th century have lived their lives without being substantially effected by a car. It is even said that an American remembers two things for their whole life; their first love, and their first car. In many people's cases it is sure to be the same thing. The Roaring twenties were fueled by the industry of the automobile, many people's last hope lay in their car during the depression, and even in 'The Great Gatsby' the automobile played a large role. So what happens when such an important part of America fails? Unsurprisingly, you dont need to look any farther than today's news. GM and Ford crowd the headlines paired with extremely large sums of money, if the American car company were to fail, what would we do with ourselves? 'Roger and Me' documents that case of 'what if', if only on a small scale. But multiply that nationwide, and you have a very very serious problem on our hands. Michigan, the nearly former car center of the world, is one of the hardest hit areas of the country, with a 12% unemployment rate. And the scenes of 'Roger and me' and even 'semi-pro' from the streets of flint have spread throughout Michigan. So when it comes to the question of "what are we supposed to do with these failing former goliaths?" We can use Flint, Detriot, and the rest of Michigan as an example of what America can become if we let such important aspects of Americana fail. So the Automobile may not be the heart of the American economy, but it for sure is one of the critical organs, maybe the liver, or the stomach, or muscles. And AIG can unfortunately be the heart.

Where New Money is Becoming Old

Although the article I got inspiration for this post from isnt really written about specifically old and new money, but it does have a few similarities to The Great Gatsby. 'You Can't Go Home Again' is about the weakening of the conservative and republican stronghold, Orange County. Johnathan Durnham describes a typical scene in the O.C. where high school girls carry lattes and credit cards, and high end restaurants filled with high end people. This famous western county was born during the post-WWII boom of government funded defense projects and then the prosperity of California's hollywood and computer booms. Since then the O.C. has been considered new money, but how long can new money last? Eventually it is no longer 'new', and becomes part of the ranks of 'Old' Money. The O.C. is changing with new immigrants from the all around, attracted to such a famous social society. But  inevitably the social class will change as well, and either whether the scene changes to 'old' money or loses its affluent will depend on how things play out. But it got me to thinking about if the society depicted in The Great Gatsby still remains, if it ever did, on 'East and West Egg' and how the money and society came to be in the first place.

A Shift in the Job Market

With today's economic situation, every aspect of the economy is changing, including the face of a typical worker. The face of a typical American worker has never remained constant for very long, in the beginning there were farmers who's main difference was what they grew. Then emerged small business and craftsmen such as newspaper's, some of these small businesses dramatically transformed into huge corporations which ushered in the era of assembly lines and sweatshops. One could argue that this was when the worker transformed from a unique individual who took pride in each of his works into simply a number on the assembly line who's only purpose was to tighten that one bolt or cut that one piece of metal. This was the time when a businessman's goal turned from quality to quantity, and not just about the end product. Individual workers were turned into a simple huge number. It's easy to get that feeling these days with all these huge numbers being thrown around, you lose some of the effect after hearing over and over again "GM to cut 30,000 jobs" or "Stimulus package worth $1 trillion". Workers are bundled together so much that they have been turned into a labor force, as if they were one thing thrown around, like the cattle or pigs of the stockyards. No one takes notice when they hear "we slaughter 50,000 pigs" but the most hardened men cringe when they hear the scream of one single pig being slaughtered. I found the similarity while reading a local article about a family diner going out of business and 5 people losing their jobs and having to sell their house with their future in jeopardy. Those 5 people losing their jobs and well being is a tragedy, "GM cuts 30,000 jobs" is only a statistic. Im not very sure why we react so differently, but it might be linked to the time period we are studying in AS, proving that the dehumanization of the masses of factory workers still lingers in little places to this day.

Worse than the Great Depression?

I just came accross this article by Jack Cafferty bringing up and explaining a quote by a leading financial investor, George Soros. Soros claims that the financial crisis we are in is worse than even the Great Depression. Soros said that "The economy went into freefall and is still falling and we dont know where the bottom will be until we get there and there's no sign that we are anywhere near a bottom". He also says that our problems originate in the 1980's with deregulation, and that now is the begining of the end of the free market. As we start our unit exploring financial situations, it should be remembered that each system of an economy has its risks, and that each one controls the ordinary John and Sally. No form of economy is safe from risks, the largest example of Communism failed in the early 90's, and now we, the free market, are in a crisis. Thats not to say that we will plunge into chaos and anarchy, as is mentioned in the article, we have much more safe nets and are no where near the statistics of 25% unemployment of the Great Depression. But no one knows how our example of the free market could turn out after this crisis, it could turn into something we barely even notice. The fact is that there is no perfect form of economy where everyone lives in harmony and peace, People can only try.

The Ultimate Exaggerated Holiday

Recently, that holiday we all love or hate just came and went. Obviously, I am talking about Valentine's Day, the so-called 'Hallmark Holiday'. I think it is fair to call it that, since around this time of year we are bombarded with commercials to buy our loved ones this or that. And I have little problem with commercials for cards, flowers, chocolate, or even jewelry, because this kind of stuff is what people are looking for on Valentine's day. You cant really get angry at marketers for advertising things for a holiday which are in demand, but I think the reason many people hate the holiday is because of those other guys that try and adjust their random product to fit into the theme of hearts and roses and proceed to attempt to sell it with a special "one time offer" Valentine's Day theme. Valentine's day was a prime chance for marketers to sell and exaggerate their products. I really saw an Officemax commercial based for Valentine's Day products. It might just be me who thinks it, but whoever resorts to buying paper and staples for their significant other for Valentine's Day ought to get their priorities straight. In today's world, marketers try and find every reason to convince people to buy their stuff, and it doesnt even matter if their product has no relation to the event to begin with; as long as you can market it to the widest range of people and make it look so much more appealing than it really is. Holidays like Valentine's day are so often used to sell products which are over incredibly over romanticized that we forget the true meaning of February the 14th, which is that other meaning of romanticism, (and of course to buy roses and Hallmark cards). Anything further than that is just ridiculous.

Romanticizing a Blanket

So I know this is two days late, but I thought it was by sunday, not Friday. But anyways, something I find very over-romanticized and laugh at every time I see on TV is infomercials, but my favorite overly dramatic infomercial would have to be Snuggies. The commercial can be found here. Sure we all love a good blanket in front of a fireplace, and who doesnt like being warm when its cold, but the snuggie commercials go a bit far. Is it really that difficult to pick up a phone, read a book, or do simple tasks in a normal blanket? I for one have ever experienced blanket-induced disabilities, and when Im cold at a sporting event, I wear a coat. I usually dont mind a good infomercial, they give a little unintended comic relief, but Snuggies may go a bit far in romanticizing their product. The commercials make Snuggies seem like a necessity, without which you could never be comfortable. And then they even go farther and portray the snuggie as a sociably normal thing. I for one, and I dont know anyone else who would, would never wear basically a bathrobe around town. So although a Snuggie might be warm and nice around the home, it cant be very different from a normal blanket, and the benefits of simply a backwards bathrobe are incredibly over-romanticized and exaggerated. It may not be very practical, but it does work well as just a comedic relief among a million boring commercials

Congratulating the 'Daddy' of all Republicans

When I think of satire, I usually think of "The Daily Show" or "The Colbert Report", and only recently have I begun to think of Mark Twain in that sense too. Satire seems to often be a smaller or less influential figure attacking a larger idea, such as Mark Twain satirizing all of the south. So it me by surprise when I came upon a somewhat influential person taking on another of about equal status. I dont know why, but i found it very amusing to read, even though it doesnt seem to be written with the purpose of highly entertaining the reader. Here, in "A History Lesson for Rush Limbaugh", CNN's James Carvil attack's Limbaugh with heavy sarcasm a dash of juxtaposition and a bit of exaggeration. It would have been easy for me to read over this just a few months ago and maybe only just pick up on a bit of sarcasm, but while reading the article I felt like i was reading what Carvil meant instead of just reading what he wrote. And I have to thank Twain and AmStud for my sharpened satire senses. Now with my super satire senses, I can read beneath the seemingly innocent words and into the sarcasm and mockery which lies beneath.